|
Home
Printer friendly versions
English
1360Kb pdf
Kiswahili
1369Kb pdf
| |
Financing the Plan
|
In this section we look first at the government's financial and budgeting situation and review recent trends in how the money was spent. This leads to thoughts about how the plan might be costed and funded, and to an outline of the strategy that will be used to finance the plan. |
|
The amount of money collected by the Government has increased from about 14 billion shillings in 1994/95 to about 63 billion shillings in 1999/00. Most of this has come from indirect taxes and especially from import taxes.
This revenue, however, has not kept pace with expenditure. The overall balance (after taking grants in to account) has been negative in all years apart from 1997/98. The gap (the budget deficit) has been filled mainly by borrowing from domestic banks (and thus increasing the national debt).
|
The government has been working towards the long term policies laid out in the Zanzibar Vision 2020 which are translated into short term policies for each annual budget. The major objectives in the 2000/01 budget, for example, included the following:
 |
expenditure limited to available resources |
 |
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate up from 4.5% to 5% |
 |
revenue levels to reach 30% of GDP |
 |
reduction in the national debt |
 |
greater participation of the private sector in the provision of social services |
The savings that were thus made were to be used to improve education, health and the environment. |
|
Government
Revenue is the
government’s annual income from which it meets all the public
expenses. A large part of the revenue comes from import tax but
there is also non-tax revenue from licences and fees and the
possibility of loans and grants.
Public Expenditure is
what the government spends its money on. The Government very rarely
has as much money as it needs and it therefore has to decide how
much to spend on different Ministries eg Education OR Health OR
Roads. There is also the problem of deciding how much to spend to
support issues that cut across several different ministries eg
gender, environment etc. |
|

A budget frame is a planning tool which helps to calculate totals for revenue and expenditure. The problem in Zanzibar is that the revenue comes mainly from import tax and it is not enough to meet all the expenditure needs. There are only two ways to solve this problem - increase government revenue and/or decrease government expenditure. Neither of these are popular moves and it is therefore useful to review recurrent and development expenditure for two main reasons:
 |
to make sure that money is being spent in the most appropriate way and on the sectors which can have the most influence on poverty reduction |
 |
to help streamline the public sector, reform the civil service and reduce unnecessary and sometimes wasteful patterns of expenditure |
|
Table:
Recurrent Expenditure by category
| Category |
1999/00
millions of shillings |
| Personal emoluments |
12146 |
| Allowances |
9492 |
| Miscellaneous |
5114 |
| Subventions |
4509 |
| Public Debt |
1568 |
| Maintenance |
960 |
| Services |
897 |
| Seminars and
Training |
628 |
| Students welfare |
201 |
| Office Supplies |
143 |
|
Total
|
35658
|
Notes:
 |
Personal emoluments and allowances take up 60% of the budget |
 |
Repayment of debt takes up 4.4% of the budget |
 |
Services (ie education, health, water and agriculture) take up only 2.5% of the budget |
|
|
There are two types of expenditure - recurrent and development. Recurrent expenditure includes things like salaries and electricity bills which have to be paid on a regular basis. Development expenditure includes one-off items such as a new bridge or sewerage system. Two major items in recurrent expenditure are personal emoluments (salaries, allowances for staff travel, and general training) and other charges
(eg maintenance, utilities, services and supplies).
It is important to make sure that these different kinds of expenditure are well controlled. The table shows how the recurrent expenditure was framed in 1999/00.
| The ZPRP budget frame includes decreasing the
recurrent expenditure from 44 to 38% of GDP in 2000/01 and
increasing development expenditure from 0.4 to 15.6% of GDP in the
same period. |
|

The following table shows how much of the recurrent budget went to the different parts of government in two different financial years:
Table: Recurrent Expenditure by Sectors
| Sector |
1997/98 |
1999/00 |
| millions of shillings |
per cent of total |
millions of shillings |
per cent of total |
| Finance & Economy |
5750 |
25 |
10960 |
31 |
| Education |
4279 |
18 |
5425 |
15 |
| Justice |
2625 |
11 |
3740 |
10 |
| Administration |
3003 |
13 |
3659 |
10 |
| Others |
1506 |
6 |
3510 |
10 |
| Health & Social
Welfare |
2829 |
12 |
2813 |
8 |
| Agriculture |
1518 |
7 |
2052 |
6 |
| Infrastructure |
1573 |
7 |
1931 |
5 |
| Public Debt |
0 |
0 |
1568 |
4 |
|
Total
|
23083 |
99 |
35658 |
99 |
Notes:
 |
The percentage of the budget for both health and education has dropped but it will have to increase under the ZPRP |
 |
The percentage of the budget for agriculture has stayed about the same but it will also have to increase under ZPRP especially those parts that deal with extension and research services |
 |
Justice has remained about 10% since it rose from 7% in 1996/97. This includes the costs of the high court, the attorney general's office, prisons and the anti-smuggling unit. A new Ministry of Constitutional Affairs and Good Governance has been created to improve governance and the administration of justice. This will need extra resources. |

A Public Expenditure Review (PER) involves looking very closely at exactly how government ministries and departments spend their money. Amongst other things these reviews can calculate unit costs for a service (eg how much does it cost the government to keep one child in primary school for one year). Until such reviews are made of all the priority sector ministries it is difficult to tell how much money they need and therefore to set detailed priorities.
Trying to calculate the amount of future government revenue (mainly from taxes) is also a difficult exercise. Factors that need to be considered include:
 |
a review of the past performance of particular types of tax |
 |
the effect of improvements in the tax collection systems |
 |
the strengths and weaknesses of widening the tax base |
 |
developments in the international economy - especially where they affect imports and exports |
 |
the amount of external funding that might be available as grants or loans |
Using the above types of information the government will be able to create a Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) to guide its future activities. But this needs to make allowance for the government not being alone in the fight against poverty. There are other stakeholders.

|
The government will encourage and support the participation of the private sector, non government organisations and communities in providing essential services. If these civil society organisations take on the role of service providers in particular areas (eg some aspects of Education and Health) then the government will be free to use its limited resources in other priority areas. |

|
There already appears to be a division of roles. The government is the main provider of basic services especially in the rural areas while others are becoming more dominant in providing services at secondary and tertiary levels. If this pattern is seen as acceptable then the government should in future prioritise spending on the basic services and limit itself to providing support and encouragement at the other levels.

|
Much of the external funding that is presently available (grants, loans and investments) is aimed at relatively short term infrastructure projects such as roads and electricity which are relatively easy to plan, design and evaluate. This is very welcome but (a) it is not enough and (b) it means that there are still shortfalls in funding for social sector projects such as education and health, and for the capacity building measures that would help to overcome the training and governance problems.
There are some areas in the social sector which have to be tackled in the relatively short term so as to encourage more direct small-scale assistance not only from government but also from development NGOs and communities themselves. Various problems in small-holder agriculture, education and health can be tackled through micro-project activities which directly involve members of the communities. It might be possible to attract external support for these kinds of activities. |
Table: Estimated levels of external funding for 2002/03 to 2004/05
| Sector |
Thousands of dollars |
| Infrastructure |
32620 |
| Water and
Power |
21020
|
| Health
and welfare |
9020
|
| Education
and skills development |
8608
|
| Agriculture
and natural resources |
4771
|
| Housing
|
2200
|
| Planning
and development capacity |
160
|
| TOTAL
|
78399
|
|


|