Note 3
Home About Us Introduction Contents Types of Poverty Poverty in Z Main Thrust Is it working? Priorities Action Areas Note 1 Note 2 Note 3

Home

Printer friendly versions

English
1360Kb pdf


Kiswahili
1369Kb pdf

Financing the Plan

In this section we look first at the government's financial and budgeting situation and review recent trends in how the money was spent. This leads to thoughts about how the plan might be costed and funded, and to an outline of the strategy that will be used to finance the plan.

bullet A review of Zanzibar Government Finances
bullet How the Zanzibar budget is made
bullet The changing pattern of government spending
bullet Estimating the cost of the plan
bullet Working with partners
bullet Possible external support
bullet How the plan will be paid for

A review of Zanzibar Government Finances

The amount of money collected by the Government has increased from about 14 billion shillings in 1994/95 to about 63 billion shillings in 1999/00. Most of this has come from indirect taxes and especially from import taxes. 

This revenue, however, has not kept pace with expenditure. The overall balance (after taking grants in to account) has been negative in all years apart from 1997/98. The gap (the budget deficit) has been filled mainly by borrowing from domestic banks (and thus increasing the national debt).

The government has been working towards the long term policies laid out in the Zanzibar Vision 2020 which are translated into short term policies for each annual budget. The major objectives in the 2000/01 budget, for example, included the following:

 
bullet expenditure limited to available resources
bullet Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate up from 4.5% to 5%
bullet revenue levels to reach 30% of GDP
bullet reduction in the national debt
bullet greater participation of the private sector in the provision of social services

The savings that were thus made were to be used to improve education, health and the environment.

Government Revenue is the government’s annual income from which it meets all the public expenses. A large part of the revenue comes from import tax but there is also non-tax revenue from licences and fees and the possibility of loans and grants.

Public Expenditure is what the government spends its money on. The Government very rarely has as much money as it needs and it therefore has to decide how much to spend on different Ministries eg Education OR Health OR Roads. There is also the problem of deciding how much to spend to support issues that cut across several different ministries eg gender, environment etc.

 

How the Zanzibar budget is made

A budget frame is a planning tool which helps to calculate totals for revenue and expenditure. The problem in Zanzibar is that the revenue comes mainly from import tax and it is not enough to meet all the expenditure needs. There are only two ways to solve this problem - increase government revenue and/or decrease government expenditure. Neither of these are popular moves and it is therefore useful to review recurrent and development expenditure for two main reasons:
bullet to make sure that money is being spent in the most appropriate way and on the sectors which can have the most influence on poverty reduction
bullet to help streamline the public sector, reform the civil service and reduce unnecessary and sometimes wasteful patterns of expenditure 

Table: Recurrent Expenditure by category

Category 1999/00
millions of shillings
Personal emoluments 12146
Allowances 9492
Miscellaneous 5114
Subventions 4509
Public Debt 1568
Maintenance 960
Services 897
Seminars and Training 628
Students welfare 201
Office Supplies 143

Total

35658

Notes:
bullet Personal emoluments and allowances take up 60% of the budget
bullet Repayment of debt takes up 4.4% of the budget
bullet Services (ie education, health, water and agriculture) take up only 2.5% of the budget

There are two types of expenditure - recurrent and development. Recurrent expenditure includes things like salaries and electricity bills which have to be paid on a regular basis. Development expenditure includes one-off items such as a new bridge or sewerage system. Two major items in recurrent expenditure are personal emoluments (salaries, allowances for staff travel, and general training) and other charges (eg maintenance, utilities, services and supplies). 

It is important to make sure that these different kinds of expenditure are well controlled. The table shows how the recurrent expenditure was framed in 1999/00.

 
The ZPRP budget frame includes decreasing the recurrent expenditure from 44 to 38% of GDP in 2000/01 and increasing development expenditure from 0.4 to 15.6% of GDP in the same period.

 

 

The changing pattern of government spending

The following table shows how much of the recurrent budget went to the different parts of government in two different financial years:

Table: Recurrent Expenditure by Sectors

Sector 1997/98 1999/00
millions of shillings per cent of total millions of shillings per cent of total
Finance & Economy 5750 25 10960 31
Education 4279 18 5425 15
Justice 2625 11 3740 10
Administration 3003 13 3659 10
Others 1506 6 3510 10
Health & Social Welfare 2829 12 2813 8
Agriculture 1518 7 2052 6
Infrastructure 1573 7 1931 5
Public Debt 0 0 1568 4

Total

23083 99 35658 99

Notes:

 
bullet The percentage of the budget for both health and education has dropped but it will have to increase under the ZPRP
bullet The percentage of the budget for agriculture has stayed about the same but it will also have to increase under ZPRP especially those parts that deal with extension and research services
bullet Justice has remained about 10% since it rose from 7% in 1996/97. This includes the costs of the high court, the attorney general's office, prisons and the anti-smuggling unit. A new Ministry of Constitutional Affairs and Good Governance has been created to improve governance and the administration of justice. This will need extra resources.

 

Estimating the cost of the plan

A Public Expenditure Review (PER) involves looking very closely at exactly how government ministries and departments spend their money. Amongst other things these reviews can calculate unit costs for a service (eg how much does it cost the government to keep one child in primary school for one year). Until such reviews are made of all the priority sector ministries it is difficult to tell how much money they need and therefore to set detailed priorities.

Trying to calculate the amount of future government revenue (mainly from taxes) is also a difficult exercise. Factors that need to be considered include:

 
bullet a review of the past performance of particular types of tax
bullet the effect of improvements in the tax collection systems
bullet the strengths and weaknesses of widening the tax base
bullet developments in the international economy - especially where they affect imports and exports
bullet the amount of external funding that might be available as grants or loans

Using the above types of information the government will be able to create a Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) to guide its future activities. But this needs to make allowance for the government not being alone in the fight against poverty. There are other stakeholders.

 

Working with partners

The government will encourage and support the participation of the private sector, non government organisations and communities in providing essential services. If these civil society organisations take on the role of service providers in particular areas (eg some aspects of Education and Health) then the government will be free to use its limited resources in other priority areas.

There already appears to be a division of roles. The government is the main provider of basic services especially in the rural areas while others are becoming more dominant in providing services at secondary and tertiary levels. If this pattern is seen as acceptable then the government should in future prioritise spending on the basic services and limit itself to providing support and encouragement at the other levels.

 

Possible external support

Much of the external funding that is presently available (grants, loans and investments) is aimed at relatively short term infrastructure projects such as roads and electricity which are relatively easy to plan, design and evaluate. This is very welcome but (a) it is not enough and (b) it means that there are still shortfalls in funding for social sector projects such as education and health, and for the capacity building measures that would help to overcome the training and governance problems.

There are some areas in the social sector which have to be tackled in the relatively short term so as to encourage more direct small-scale assistance not only from government but also from development NGOs and communities themselves. Various problems in small-holder agriculture, education and health can be tackled through micro-project activities which directly involve members of the communities. It might be possible to attract external support for these kinds of activities.

Table: Estimated levels of external funding for 2002/03 to 2004/05

Sector Thousands of dollars
Infrastructure 32620
Water and Power 21020
Health and welfare 9020
Education and skills development 8608
Agriculture and natural resources 4771
Housing 2200
Planning and development capacity 160
TOTAL 78399

 

How the plan will be paid for

The ZPRP lists many areas where work has to be done to reduce poverty. At present there are three main difficulties in carrying out the work 

 

  1. not enough funding 
  2. not enough absorptive capacity (ie skilled people who are able and willing to do the work) and 
  3. some governance issues.

Much of the finance for the ZPRP will come from local money - both government and private. For this to be possible the government will have to ensure a stable economic environment that has:

 
bullet a 6-8% broad-based and widely-shared rate of growth
bullet inflation reduced from 5% to 4%
bullet a sustainable current account and fiscal balance
bullet It will then be possible to
bullet increase the amount of money which the government takes in (revenue)
bullet spend it strategically and according to the plan (expenditure)
bullet co-finance poverty reduction initiatives that complement government efforts
bullet support private sector and community based initiatives

 

Back Home