 | Provide update information to civil society participants on the current country
situation with regard to poverty and PRSP including the national institutional framework
for the Poverty Monitoring System. |
 | · Expose CSOs to basic concepts on poverty and PRSP, international debt issues and
current macro-economic frameworks (TAS/PRSP etc.) |
 | · Equip participants with skills and methods of monitoring poverty/PRSP at the
community, district and national levels. |
 | · Introduce CSOs to the techniques and skills for effective lobbying and advocacy. |
 | · Agree on engagement strategies, and clear time bound benchmarks and action points for
CSOs participation in monitoring poverty and PRSP at the community, district and national
levels. |
 | To learn and share the experience on PRSP, and other structural barriers towards PRSP
implementation process |
 | To come up with common understanding on strategies to monitor poverty and PRSP |
 | Exposed to up to date data on poverty and poverty situation in the country as well as
definition of poverty |
 | To educate NGOs/grassroots people about PRSP/Monitoring system. Some participants did
not know how monitoring is carried out so they expected to learn this in this workshop and
go back in their districts well equipped ready for monitoring work. Moreover, others were
expecting to hear what benefits PRSP has to people and what are benefits of/for CSOs
engagement in monitoring poverty and PRSP |
 | Apart from learning how monitoring is done, they were also expecting to learn some
techniques i.e. lobbying, advocacy in order to be able to use them to influence government
policies and decisions. |
 | Causes of debts was another area where participants were looking forward to be able to
learn a lot and even come up with suggestions on how the country would avoid to enter into
more debts in the future |
 | Exposed to Poverty Participatory Appraisal (PPA) tools, because the main objective
of the workshop was monitoring poverty and PRSP. PPAs were seen as a starting point
towards the long journey of monitoring. They also expected to learn how to value
experiences of grassroots CSOs/NGOs. |
 | Identify strengths and weaknesses of PRSP, participants expected to use this workshop to
identify some strengths and weaknesses in PRSP and to improve the process by addressing
those weaknesses. |
 | Mainstreaming of burning issues like Gender and HIV/AIDS in the monitoring of PRSP were
also raised as one of expectations. |
 | To other participants this was prime time to start networking with other
actors/CSOs (TCDD members) engaged in monitoring poverty and PRSP, at the same time
to get the profile of CSOs engaged PRSP. |